In July, 1996, the annual Does God Exist? summer seminar was held in Australia. Each summer, we hold a seminar to train people and motivate people to do the kind of work we do. Sometimes the seminars are classroom-type programs, and other times they are natural seminars in which participants travel to an area of special interest and relevance to the question of God's existence.
In 1996, we worked with Queenslander Travel in Denver and Mr. Mark Story in a program designed to expose participants to the uniqueness of Australia. In addition to the trip with participants who went from the United States, we conducted lectureships in Blacktown (near Sydney), Cairns, and Brisbane. We also had a number of Australian Christians who went with us on our special trips into natural places.
Australia is a marvelous place to see a lot of unique things that involve evolution and geology. In evolution, there is a principal known as isolation that is used to explain why isolated animal populations are so unique. Australia has animals which are found no place else in the world--the platypus, kangaroo, the echidna (or spiny anteater), and the koala bear just to name a few. These animals are radically different from the animals one sees in North America or Europe. The mammals are marsupials using a very different reproductive system and, in some cases like the platypus, having physical properties unlike any other animal on the planet. No American birds are seen in Australia--no hummingbirds, cardinals, robins, bluejays, or tanagers. Instead, we see parrots, cockateels, kookaburras, etc.
Why does Australia have this unique collection of life? Evolutionists tell us that Australia once had the same animal populations as the Asian and European areas it was attached to. As geologic forces separated Australia from these areas, their animal populations could no longer interbreed. Genetic changes that took place in the population would stay in that population. A crow might have a mutation that would produce a white spot, and its offspring would inherit this mutation. Soon all the crows would have the white mark. In fact, there is a crow-like bird in Australia with such a white mark in its plumage. The other ingredient evolutionists postulate to explain the uniqueness of the animals in places like Australia is natural selection.
Changes in animals that give them the ability to survive a predator, disease, or climate change can be passed on to their offspring. Undesirable characteristics in animals will cause these animals to be killed, and these characteristics will cease to exist in the animal population. Marsupial mammals like kangaroos, koala bears, etc., are unable to compete with placental mammals. This would mean that any marsupial on a land mass where placental mammals existed would be likely to be eradicated. In fact, the only marsupial in North America is the opossum. Rabbits, cats, dogs, water buffalo, and sheep have caused massive problems of survival for Australia's native animals and plants because the native animals cannot compete with these introduced placental mammals.
This very brief and superficial explanation has been attempted in order to demonstrate a point. Is there anything in this explanation which is at odds with a literal understanding of the Bible? In the Genesis account, the Hebrew word for kind is the word "min." The Bible treats this word as a very broad term covering a large variety of animals. The "flesh of fish" in passages like I Corinthians 15:39 and Genesis 1:20 does not refer to a goldfish, pike, perch, carp, bass, etc.-- but simply to the group. The Bible also indicates to us that living things can change. The serpent lost his legs at the curse, Jacob made changes in the flocks of Laban, and many humans such as Esau clearly had unique physical characteristics at birth. From a Christian scientific view, it is God who created the major groups in such a way that the early forms had a gene pool containing the potential for surviving in all kinds of environments. If this had not been done, every time there was a change in climate, everything would have died. Australia is a classic example of the process because the climate of Australia has gone through major changes, and plant and animal life has had to adapt to all these changes.
The only real conflict that could exist between a scientist of atheistic persuasion and one of Christian belief is the source of the genetic information that allows adaptation to occur. The Christian maintains that the genetic codes are a product of intelligent design by God while the atheist maintains that blind, mechanistic chance forces have produced totally by accident all kinds of gene pools, including the desired ones. There have been numerous statistical studies showing that such proposals are not possible,* but it is the only alternative to God's Creation.
Not only is Australia of special interest because of its unique animals, but it is also of special interest because of its age. Earthquakes, volcanoes, and other products of active geologic forces are a rarity in Australia. It is a very dry land with very little modern modification by running water. As one goes from Sydney to the west, you go through the wettest part of the continent. Less than 100 miles west of Sydney you are in the Blue Mountains. The area is easy to identify as it is a huge plateau which has been eroded in a way that reminds you of the Grand Canyon except that, due to the rainfall, it is rich in trees. As you drive into the Blue Mountains, you go past faults that can be seen in the road cuts along the highway as shown at A in the diagram. The plateau is very easy to see with the layer at B being the same rock in all ways as at C. Like the Grand Canyon, the stair step arrangement of the layers is due to the different degrees of hardness of the rocks making up the layers.
There have been those in the religious community who have tried to view any understanding of the ancient history of the earth as a threat to faith and yet, as you look at a coal seam at the bottom of dozens of layers of rocks from all different kinds of environments, you cannot deny that there is a history there. The Bible does not deal with this history. All the Bible tells us is that "God created the heaven and the earth." How God did it or when God did it is not revealed to us. What the Bible tells us is the history of man and, more particularly, man's spiritual history.
Man's ability to read the physical history of the earth in the rocks has led to the discovery of oil, gas, coal, metal, uranium, and water resources throughout the earth. God created these resources in such a way that we can find them, but only if we understand how and where they were produced. Finding an oil deposit 16,000 feet underground would be an impossible dream unless you have some idea of how it got there.
The rejection of the Bible and the denial of the existence of God are strong beliefs in Australia. During our discussions with nonbelieving Australians, it was obvious that they were really rejecting the denominational creationists and their man-made theologies, not God nor the Bible. Over and over, we heard comments about the impossibility of believing that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time, that the earth was 6,000 years old, that God created the cosmos full-grown with fossils buried in the ground, etc. When we were able to get them to read Genesis and look at what it really said and what it did not say, we were able to change their whole approach to their relationship to God. Australia has a lot to teach us--both in terms of what we can see in the creation and also in terms of how important it is that we get away from human traditions and theologies and just listen to what God has to say and what He does not say.
Thaxton, Charles B., Walter L., Bradley, and Roger L. Olsen,
The Mystery of life's
Origin: Reassessing Current Theories, 1984.
Crick, Francis, Life Itself, Simon & Schuster. 1981.
Back to Contents Does God Exist?, Nov/Dec 1996